A Shot In The Heart
Loss of Wayne State hits harder than previous folds
Sept. 27, 2007
By Dave Starman
Special to CSTV.com
![]() |
DAVE STARMAN
Dave is a CSTV game and studio analyst, and contributes regular insight to CSTV.com. E-mail here! |
Here's the problem with Wayne State folding.
When you think about some of the programs that might have folded in recent memory, they've been in areas where hockey was popular, but it's not grassroots, and it's not part of the fabric or culture.
When you lose a
|
|
|
Of course,
Hypothetically, if they could have gotten out of the CHA into the CCHA, maybe that makes a big difference, but without knowing the finances and knowing the school's priority on athletics, it's hard to say what might have been done to avoid this. It's certainly not a case where they didn't have a coach with a reputation, because Bill Wilkinson is about as respected -- not only in the state of
Of course, the next question is where we go from here.
For the CHA and its remaining members, now it becomes a question of geography. The women's CHA has four members and no automatic bid to the NCAA tournament, and if the men's side goes that route, it'll be harder for those schools in recruiting, because they won't be able to tell a kid that if they win the conference, they'll be in the NCAA tournament.
The other route, obviously, is dissolving the conference, and then it becomes a question of who fits into which conference. Will the Big Four and Atlantic Hockey be willing to absorb these schools? Can Niagara play in
Now, if it becomes a question of programs being absorbed, then some will say that puts an end to expansion in college hockey, since the CHA has been seen as a starting point for fledgling programs. Personally, I don't think it can kill the growth of anything as long as you have schools that have got the ability to put a team out there. Title IX is a factor more than anything, and facilities are a big factor as well, bigger than which conference you'd play in. I think that for any school that wants to put in a Division I hockey program right now, you'd better have your building in first before you do anything, because recruiting kids to play in a municipal rink is tough.
The other issue that's going to come up if you're down to five conferences in college hockey is whether the NCAA tournament will go back to 12 teams. I don't think that's going to happen. I think the powers that be probably realize that if you add one more team in from a "Big Four" conference instead of the CHA winner, you increase your chances of getting a marquee team in there. I think that for a national tournament to generate more interest -- with no disrespect to some of the lower-profile schools -- schools that have Big Ten football and basketball counterparts need to be in it. Boston University and Boston College need to be in it.
Of course, these are all issues that are going to have to be discussed, and one thing I'm very confident in is the people who are going to be discussing these issues. My feeling is that if CCHA commissioner Tom Anastos and Hockey East commissioner Joe Bertagna are involved in any of this, it'll get done the right way. I've always felt that way. ECAC Hockey commissioner Steve Hagwell is also starting to prove that he's as committed to growing the game as anybody, and Bruce McLeod in the WCHA has been around forever and he knows the landscape. If things don't get done that need to get done here, I seriously doubt it will be their fault.
In the meantime, it's very tough for the college hockey community to see a program go in "Hockeytown."


Blue Dot
Yahoo!