Are Husker Fans Lowering Their Expectations?
Callahan `hot seat' comment creates quite the stir
June 1, 2007
By Trev Alberts
Special to CSTV.com
![]() |
TREV ALBERTS
Trev Alberts is a football analyst for CSTV and CSTV.com. |
You've got college football questions and CSTV football analyst Trev Alberts has answers and opinions. Each week Alberts will be answering questions and queries on the world of college football. So if you've got a question for Trev, just ask him.
Why as a former player and fan of Husker football have you said that Coach Callahan is on the hot seat. I agree with you that he does need to start winning these big games soon...but Trev come on. I hope you understand that you have hurt the program and have really made people who are
|
|
|
We of course had outstanding feedback from Nebraska fans this week, but there weren't very many questions posed and I'll start this week's mailbag off with this statement: I might indeed have lost touch with Nebraska football in some respects because somewhere between three or four years ago, apparently expectations have been lowered.
Let me state for the record that I am a huge
I had the privilege of narrating a three parts series that many Huskers fans have on the history of
This isn't a Frank Solich vs. Bill Callahan argument. I've read many of the posts, the threads, the blogs, and I'm not sure people remember me sitting at a desk in a studio at a competing network saying it was the right move to go in a different direction. I've had some reservations how Solich's firing was handled, but please don't try and turn this into an "I'm disappointed Solich isn't still the head coach." If Solich didn't get the job done, it was time for somebody to get it done. On a totally different matter, you could argue the point of whether or not Solich got the job done.
But when I came up with the names of those on the "hot seat" last week, it never was supposed to be a list of coaches who ought to be fired. The point is this: Callahan finds himself in the same position that other coaches that preceded him found themselves in. This is year No. 4 and it's time to produce. Nobody said he's not going to get it done. Let's not forget Steve Pederson essentially saying
Now,
All I've merely said all along is that there are no more excuses. This is the year, according to
I didn't say I didn't like Bill Callahan, or how difficult it is to change from an option based attack to a West Coast offense. But it is year No. 4. And I never said they weren't making progress. There's been progress, but it should be fairly easy to make progress with a stable staff, all the recruits, new facilities and having everything in place they supposedly need. Steve Pederson has done everything for Bill Callahan, bending over backwards for him. All I've said is that a seven win season, according to what I used to think the expectations were, is unacceptable. I guess I've lost touch because when Solich won only seven games that state was in a complete uproar.
When
This isn't a statement that I want Steve Pederson fired or Bill Callahan fired or Frank Solich back coaching or Tom Osborne. This is not a Bill Callahan issue or a Steve Pederson issue. I fully understand how difficult their jobs are. But when I read blogs that say when
There will come a time, and I don't care who it is, when a coach will come under fire. There will come a time when Charlie Weis, if he keeps losing too many more games to
And getting back to the original email, just because the coaching search last time wasn't handled correctly, and was ineffective, doesn't mean there aren't people dying to come coach at
With all this talk about a playoff, what format do you think makes the most sense? The plus-one, a four-team, eight-team, 16-team? - Kevin Long,
I'm trying to transition from my passion and enthusiasm of
I have always believed an eight team playoff would be appropriate. I do think a playoff can get too long and I understand that football is different and bodies need time to heal. But I think an eight team playoff is pretty realistic. It's only one extra game for four teams and two extra games for two teams. So the point is I don't buy the fact that the season would be too long.
You can't just do a plus-one. If you have an eight team playoff, with six spots saved for conference winners and two at-large teams, that still allows you to get teams like
You can use the bowl games as part of the season and do the best you can to keep the traditions that make college football what it is. You could even use the BCS rankings to get your final eight teams. Would No. 9 have an argument for a playoff? Maybe. But certainly not as big an argument as No. 3 has in our current system.
Sixteen is too many. Plus-one to me is a glorified nothing; that's what you try to do to appease people by not making any effective changes. That being said, if I had to predict, we'll see a plus-one first.
The best uniforms continue to be uniforms like Penn State's.
We live in an era of marketing and nonsense, and that's why we end up with the
The thing I like with

Blue Dot
Yahoo!