Boise's Johnson Has No Shot At '07 Heisman

Not enough publicity and exposure for Broncos star RB

April 13, 2007

By Trev Alberts

Special to CSTV.com

 



TREV ALBERTS

Trev Alberts is a football analyst for CSTV and CSTV.com.
E-mail here!

You've got college football questions and CSTV football analyst Trev Alberts has answers and opinions. Each week Alberts will be answering questions and queries on the world of college football. So if you've got a question for Trev? Just ask him.

 

Typical Alberts "take" on the Heisman question. He still wants to relegate Boise State to some "mid-major" status with no mention of Ian Johnson, clearly a legitimate prospect in the Heisman race.

 

Oh yeah Trev, I didn't even mention that Jared Zabransky will end up being a late first day or early second day pick in the NFL draft. Furthermore, he will run circles around Brady Quinn! - Denny Freeburn

 

There is no denying the ability of Ian Johnson; nobody said he wasn't a great player. No one said Jared Zabransky wasn't a very good player. But just as Zabransky will not be drafted higher than JaMarcus Russell or Brady Quinn, neither will Ian Johnson be in New York for the Heisman Trophy ceremony. That's just the way it works. That doesn't mean it's fair.

 

I was asked who has a legitimate shot at winning the Heisman Trophy and it would be disingenuous to suggest that somebody from Boise State would have a legitimate shot. That's simply the way it is. I would like it to be different. I would like the award to be the presented to the most outstanding player in college football - supposedly that is the requirement to win.

 

But the reality is Ian Johnson is not a legitimate Heisman Trophy candidate because of where he plays and the exposure that he'll get. That doesn't mean that he might not have deserved it and that he's not as good as other hopefuls. It's just the realties of college football today.

 

Typical email from a "mid-major" fan.

 

West Virginia is going to have the best quarterback and running back combo in the nation with Pat White and Steve Slaton. There's no way they're not better than Louisville. Why are people so hung up on the Cardinals winning the Big East? - Jeff, Maryland

 

I think there's a lot more that goes into making a successful football team than the quarterback and running back. I would have to agree that the explosiveness of Pat White and Steve Slaton are unquestioned, but you have to look at it as a whole. I'm not one who is saying Louisville is necessarily better as a whole this year and they're going to win the conference over West Virginia. You have to look at their losses on both sides of the ball.

 

You know, West Virginia lost its offensive line coach - Rick Trickett - and he was a really good coach. You can easily gloss over just how good that offensive line was last year because of White and Slaton. But understanding how important the line was in giving White and Slaton the opportunity to be successful goes to show you that there's more to it than just two players. If it was only about one or two players then you would easily pick that team to win the national championship. Football is still a team game and certainly some players get more exposure than others, but I think it's going to be a great race.

 

Kudos to the Big East for the quality of play in the conference. Who would have thought a few years back, sitting here in early April, we would be arguing who is going to win the Big East? It shows how far the conference has come.

 

Is Texas A&M going to have enough to overcome Texas in the Big 12? - Aaron Jessup, Dallas, Texas

 

Whoa, Aggieland. I would slow down a little bit.

 

I really think it's an important year for Dennis Franchione. There are high expectations this year. They took a step forward last year and they have an unquestioned leader in quarterback Stephen McGee.

 

It isn't like they haven't had talent. They've had opportunities and chances to knock off some of the higher powers and they haven't gotten it done. Before we start talking about Texas A&M winning the Big 12 South, let's not forget Oklahoma is in there, as well as Texas Tech.

 

I think they should make progress, but I would not pick them to beat Texas in the South.