Feb. 20, 2008
By Trev Alberts
Special to CSTV.com
TREV ALBERTS
Trev Alberts is a football analyst for CBS College Sports and CSTV.com.
E-mail
You've got college football questions and CSTV football analyst Trev Alberts has answers and opinions. Each week Alberts will be answering questions and queries on the world of college football. So if you've got a question for Trev? Just ask him.
Rank these attributes in order of importance for a wide receiver: 1. size 2. speed 3. route running 4. hands. Which do you think is most important? -
For me, I would start with hands and say that if you don't have hands you really eliminate yourself from being in contention to play the position.
You could find a spot for someone who is maybe a step slow, but he has great hands. You can find a spot for someone who is a little shorter than usual, but has great hands. You can be the fastest guy in the world, but that doesn't mean you can stick them on the outside and immediately have a vertical threat.
If you can't catch the ball then you're playing defensive back. In a perfect world you'd be Calvin Johnson - you'd be tall, strong, fast with great hands. That's why he was the No. 2 pick in the NFL Draft last year. It's about hands. Some guys just have the natural ability to go up and get it so I would start with a guy who had good hands. I think you can improve someone's route running - you can even improve their hands - but you have to start with a great set of hands and then you can work on the rest of their game. You can always a find a spot for those receivers. Think of Wes Welker and Steve Smith.
What is your opinion about drafting running backs? I know teams feel like they can get a good back later in the draft (Amahd Bradshaw), but Adrian Peterson showed how valuable a superstar RB can be. Where would you draft a RB and specifically Darren McFadden. - Mike B.,
That's a great question. Here's the thing I've noticed since I started paying attention: the Adrian Peterson types come around rarely so I would be of the opinion that, as a general rule, you can find capable running backs throughout the draft.
I see teams reaching a lot, trying to justify in their minds that some guy is one of these premier, all-world running backs. But those guys are so few and far between. It's a position that takes so many hits that one knee injury, one bad hit can end it all. You just don't see guys like Marshall Faulk every year. So unless you're absolutely sure that he's that once in a lifetime running back, then I think you can wait and find guys.
I don't know anyone who has done a better job managing the running back position than the Indianapolis Colts. They had Faulk, then Edgerrin James and then Joseph Addai. And I think Addai is a perfect example of a very good running back. I don't know if he goes down as one of the best in NFL history, but the Colts didn't use a top 5 selection on him, either.
Unless you're absolutely sure about someone, I would not take a running back very high. But I would say Darren McFadden is a pretty sure bet.
How many years should a new head coach have to rebuild a program? As a Gamecocks fan, how much longer do you think Steve Spurrier is going to be around? -
Wow! Unbelievable. College football fans are the best. What other sport can you follow where literally in the shortest amount of time a guy like Charlie Weis can go from "genius" to "how much longer are we going to put up with this guy?"
I would certainly like to think that Gamecocks fans understand what has been accomplished under Spurrier. Sure there have been temporary lapses, but they've also won games they shouldn't have. And the thought of how much longer Spurrier will be allowed to coach there doesn't even enter my mind. I have to tell you that I don't get it. I do think he probably needs a big time quarterback. If he gets that...
I'm almost flabbergasted at the question to be quite honest with you. They're playing in the best division of the best conference in college football. And last time I checked they had to deal with Florida,
I think we get so shortsighted as fans sometimes. I remember when South Carolina was awful, but they're great fans. The go no matter what, always sell-out the place. They are not fair weather fans. I have more respect for Gamecocks fans than almost any other, but that being said, folks? Come on. How are the Gamecocks going to upgrade from Spurrier? They're still scratching the surface and building talent, but I'd be pretty pleased if I was a Gamecocks fan and Spurrier was my head coach.
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Sphere
Yahoo
Google
Email
Print