Good Call By Weis

Giving up play calling duties should help Weis and Notre Dame


Feb. 13, 2008

By Trev Alberts

Special to CSTV.com

 

TREV ALBERTS
Trev Alberts is a football analyst for CBS College Sports and CSTV.com.
E-mail

You've got college football questions and CSTV football analyst Trev Alberts has answers and opinions. Each week Alberts will be answering questions and queries on the world of college football. So if you've got a question for Trev, just ask him.

 

What quarterback battles are you most looking forward to this spring and summer? - Pierre, TN

 

I think you can always start with programs that are changing head coaches and maybe changing systems.

 

I think the battle in Lincoln will be an interesting one. Obviously Joe Ganz came in at the end of last season and brought a different element to the game, but it'll be interesting to see who takes the reins for Bo Pelini. I'm not sure how much the offense is going to change, but it should still be a West Coast type of offense because Shawn Watson stayed as the offensive coordinator.

 

It'll be interesting to see who takes the reins at Michigan. A lot, obviously, depends on Terrelle Pryor and whether he decides to go to Michigan, although everything we've read says he's not leaning that way.  

 

We'll see if the NCAA sets a precedent with a decision to allow Ryan Mallett to avoid sitting out a year after transferring. If they do, he could battle Casey Dick for the starting spot at Arkansas.

 

I think you could point to USC. At this time of year, a lot of programs are expecting guys to take over and be the starter, but you never know with a guy like Mitch Mustain on the roster. That could be an interesting battle with Mark Sanchez.

 

At Miami, there's Robert Marve and Randy Shannon, who just brought in a phenomenal recruiting class so we might see some really young kids get an opportunity.

 

Louisville has a big hole to fill with Brian Brohm leaving. They've been pretty blessed to have him down there the last few years, with that prolific offensive attack. We'll see who takes over there. Could be Matt Simms.

 

Tennessee has a big hole to fill with Erik Ainge, who will be respected more after Vols fans realize he's gone. Remember, David Cutcliffe left for Duke and there's going to be increased pressure on Phil Fulmer this season after Tennessee's recruiting class was a little disappointing.

 

What's interesting about Clemson will be how it handles the Cullen Harper-Willy Korn situation. Harper should be the starter, but when you have someone as gifted as Korn waiting in the wings sometimes there is concern about making a guy happy. Maybe it's not a quarterback battle, but how it's handled will be directly related to its success. Clemson is shaping up to be a really good football team next season.

 

How big of a deal is Charlie Weis relinquishing play-calling duties? Is Notre Dame really better off having offensive coordinator Michael Haywood calling the plays? - A.A., Indiana

 

It probably does make some sense. Coach Weis was hired because of his offensive prowess, but there is so much more to running a successful program than just calling the plays. The idea that he's no longer going to have an impact on the offense is probably inaccurate. The one thing if you're a head coach and all you do is spend all your time with the quarterback and offense it does actually affect the defense. It's a positive thing for Notre Dame. He can be more directly involved with the development to the program.

 

Sometimes you see real benefits. Look at Georgia after Mark Richt let go of play-calling duties and gave them to Mike Bobo. Many times these assistant coaches have a better feel and a better pulse on exactly what needs to happen because they're not involved with all those press conferences and other time-consuming activities.

 

It might be very beneficial for Weis to take a step back, see the bigger picture so it's a natural transition for Weis and I think Notre Dame will be better off for it.

 

Do you think steroids are a problem in college football? - Kurt, Florida

 

I know they are there. I know they are prevalent and even if there is less than 10 percent of the players doing it, it's a problem. The problem is you don't know how to solve it because it's such a competitive landscape.

 

The one thing I find interesting is that we often throw away these comments by the Jose Cansecos and John Rockers of the world. There are good points to be made from what they've said because if a lot of guys are doing steroids and you're not doing them then the playing field isn't level for you. Some of these guys dream, their whole life is based on getting a scholarship and playing at that level and I remember being told at Nebraska when I was a freshman that I needed to get bigger. Now I never did steroids, but I can tell you there is incredible pressure when you're told you need to gain 35 pounds before you're ready to play. How are you going to gain 35 pounds in a summer?

 

I think the NCAA and most universities should be applauded for how hard they try to make sure it is a level playing field. I can only tell you that at Nebraska we were tested six to eight times every year and they were random. They could be in the middle of the summer and if you were at home you had to get to Lincoln and take a drug test. I think Coach Osborne instituted that because he was so sincere about having a clean team because I believe Nebraska had a steroid problem in the early 80s. He was concerned about the welfare of his student-athletes and we were inundated with information.

 

I think the bigger problem is in high school. Some of these high school kids don't undergo the testing in high school, dream of getting a scholarship, see the external benefits of steroids, but don't see the internal destruction they can cause.

 

So I do think steroids are a problem in college football, they are prevalent. But I applaud major college football because from my experiences I believe they are trying very hard to put a stop to it. But I will say that looking back I think Human Growth Hormone was probably a lot more prevalent in the NFL than I ever knew.

Related Stories